Enantiomers.
This is another source of confusion,where the turtle analogy can also help.A turtle has a plane of
symmetry running through its head and tail, so distinguishing a left-flippered from a right-flippered turtle will require
using a technique that can discriminate D and L configurations (that is, a chiral analysis or separation method). For
example, two prominent InsP4 isomers discussed in this review are inositol-3,4,5,6-tetrakisphosphate (Ins(3,4,5,6)P4)
and Ins(1,4,5,6)P4,which both have an unphosphorylated hydroxyl in the 2-position (the head), so they differ only in
having vacant either the 1- or the 3- positions (the right versus the left front flipper). They are therefore an
enantiomeric pair, because they can be converted one to the other by reflection in the plane of symmetry. The standard
separation techniques used in inositol phosphate analyses cannot distinguish between enantiomers, so these two
InsP4s co-chromatograph exactly.Quantifying Ins(3,4,5,6)P4 and Ins(1,4,5,6)P4 separately is possible only using
enantiomer-specific enzyme-based analyses.
Note that a left-flippered (L) turtle would obviously regard its left front flipper as number 1, and so because its head is
still number 2, the limbs will be numbered clockwise starting at the front left flipper, which is why the alternative
name for Ins(3,4,5,6)P4 is L-Ins(1,4,5,6)P4. In biological journals, and in this review, the D numbering is now used
universally, but this is not so in chemical journals,where L numbering of the inositol ring is frequently found. This
presents no problem because it is always made clear in chemical journals which numbering is being used.However,
there is one aspect of nomenclature that could cause confusion, and this is that in the 1970s the official designations of
the D and L numberings of the inositol ring were actually swapped over, and so in older papers,
what you think should be called D will actually be called L and vice versa.






